handling stolen goods

If the person knew that the property was stolen at the time he received it, the crime is receiving stolen property. If you are accused of handling stolen goods, the Prosecution must prove that: You have received stolen goods, or Assisted or agreed to assist in the retention of stolen goods, or Most hearings for this crime will be heard in the Magistrate's Court, though more serious and extensive cases will be heard in the Crown Court. The Laundering is now an offence under ss.327/9 and 340(3)(b) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the distinction with handling depends on whether the defendant's intention was to launder the proceeds of crime or merely to assist a thief. It takes place after a theft or other dishonest acquisition is completed and may be committed by a fence or other person who helps the thief to realise the value of the stolen goods. The term "interstate commerce" merely refers to the movement of property from one All US states also have laws regarding receipt of stolen property; however, there usually is no minimum dollar amount in many jurisdictions, and, of course, the requirement in Federal law regarding interstate commerce does not apply. The offence of handling stolen goods is a serious dishonesty offence, created by section 22 of the Theft Act 1968.

Related Post. Check out this week’s video and stay tuned for updates every fortnight across social media and on www.policerevision.com. Theft Act 1968, s.22 Effective from: 01 February 2016 Triable either way Maximum: 14 years’ custody Offence range: Discharge – 8 years’ custody. Laundering covers large amounts of money in a series of transactions over time when the defendant knows or suspects that the assets which he has concealed, acquired, used, possessed, or in respect of which he has entered into an arrangement which he knows or suspects facilitates the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person, are the proceeds of criminal conduct (compare The wording of Section 22 actually creates eighteen ways in which handling may be committed,Section 27(3) of the Theft Act 1968 introduces a rare exception to the rule against admissibility of previous criminal conduct in the case of this offence.

For the 1915 American film, see Lying to the police about the location of known stolen goods has been sufficient to be prosecuted for reset, as it aids the criminal in retaining the goods. However, there are often exceptions, because of the difficulty of proving or disproving an individual's knowledge that the goods were stolen. The distinguishing element is when the person knew that the property was stolen. Where the value of the property is greater than $5,000, the maximum punishment on indictment is 10 years for possession only, and 14 years if related to trafficking. Thus, There was at one time an issue of impossibility in that the defendant may be dishonest and intend to handle goods (which he believes to be stolen) but which are not in fact stolen. To be guilty of the offense, a person must know that the property had been stolen, but he need not know that it was moving as, or constituted a part of, interstate commerce. The offence of handling stolen goods is a serious dishonesty offence, created by section 22 of the Theft Act 1968.If you are accused of handling stolen goods, the Prosecution must prove that:There is no need to prove whether you would have gained in any way by your alleged actions.In many cases, people accused of handling stolen goods believe they may be guilty, simply because they were in possession of items which turned out to be stolen.

If, for example, the person acquired possession for the purpose of returning the property to its lawful owner, no crime has been committed. Police Revision Bitesize 6 – Dangerous Driving A fence, also known as a receiver, mover, or moving man, is an individual who knowingly buys stolen goods in order to later resell them for profit. He went on to distinguish the case where a defendant has said "I suspect that these goods may be stolen, but it may be on the other hand that they are not"The situation is further complicated by the concept of recklessness or wilful blindness to the circumstances; either will be treated as a belief that the goods are stolen. If the individual did not know the goods were stolen, then the goods are returned to the owner and the individual is not prosecuted. User guide for this offence. More posts by James Cooper . Handling stolen goods is the name of a statutory offence in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. (ss 355 and 355.5) Evidence may be adduced (but only if handling is the only charge faced by the defendant) that the defendant (a) has been involved in similar conduct within the previous twelve months AND (b) has a previous conviction for handling within five years.A person can be found guilty of that offense only if all of the following facts are proven: Handling stolen goods. A common instance is that a person buys a second-hand computer or television, and it later turns out that that item has been taken during a burglary. "Stolen goods" redirects here.