The physiology of the ear enables auditory signals to often cut into our attention - think about For airport safety officers and work crews, radios with an external speaker, for when you get out of the vehicle, are absolutely essential for maintaining this situational awareness.I’m a big fan of this concept. Check the historical on-time performance rating for flight Aeroflot SU 3352 to help avoid frequently delayed or cancelled flights (SU) Aeroflot 3352 On-Time Performance Rating.
Aeroflot Flight 2808 (Russian: Рейс 2808 Аэрофлота Reys 2808 Aeroflota) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Mineralnye Vody to Ivanovo, both in Russia, with a stopover in Donetsk, Ukraine on 27 August 1992.While attempting to land at Ivanovo airport, the Tupolev Tu-134 crashed into a group of buildings in the village of Lebyazhy Lug. They were conducting runway drying operations and friction testing due to the rain that had been falling at the airport. An evasive manoeuvre was of no avail as the aircraft struck two vehicles and crashed in flames. The aircraft collided with three vehicles and a combination of the fuel on-board the aircraft and a significant amount of fuel on two of the vehicles ignited into a fireball. Important details regarding the works, such as vehicle information, purpose and duration, were not provided to or requested by air traffic control. The captain was highly experienced, with 16,365 hours in the air (including 4,303 hours of night flights).The flight was approaching Omsk in poor weather: light rain, visibility 3 km (2 miles) with a 100-metre (110-yard) ceiling. Thanks to advances in LED technology, compliant lighting was easy to source from At the very least, this accident highlights the need for appropriate lighting for vehicles that access the runway. With this in mind, I’m going to start a new category of posts looking at significant aircraft accidents and incidents that may have some lessons for airport operators. Landing lights were switched off as they caused a reflection due to the drizzle. I have written on this subject on It is never as simple as someone didn’t follow the rules. In the very early hours of October 11, 1984, Aeroflot Flight 3352 was inbound to Omsk Airport after an uneventful flight from Krasnodar. The ground controller on duty, who was 23 years old, was new. The maintenance crew, following the airport's routine, moved three vehicles to the runway: a This intentional oversight was to play a part in the pilots being unable to see the vehicles on the runway (they could not from the air).Around 5:36 am, Flight 3352 requested permission to land from the A state investigation concluded that the accident was caused by a chain of mistakes owing to the negligence of air traffic controllers, as well as disobedience of basic airport maintenance and safety regulations. The flight had a crew of 9. Temperature was +3°C and ceiling was measured at 110 m. At 05:33, the landing controller turned on the runway lights. All of the accused, as well as their attorneys, received threats and were moved to the hearings under heavy security.The flight carried 170 passengers, including 8 teenagers and 16 young children; 2700 kg (6000 lb) of luggage, 306 kg (670 lb) of post, and 1600 kg (3500 lb) of cargo. 178 dead. In the very early hours of October 11, 1984, Aeroflot Flight 3352 was inbound to Omsk Airport after an uneventful flight from Krasnodar. Aeroflot Flight 3352 was a Tupolev Tu-154 airline flight on a domestic route from Krasnodar to Novosibirsk, with an intermediate landing in Omsk. Every page goes through A Tupolev Tu-154B-1, similar to the one involved in the accident, in 1982.Aviation accidents and incidents in the Soviet Union and RussiaThe source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. What the controller did next is, by far, the most damming part of the incident - the controller forgot to set the runway as occupied and then he fell asleep. An Airport Operator Primer At the time it took place, the accident was the deadliest one in Soviet aviation history. As of 2013, the accident remains the second-deadliest one involving an Il-62, after LOT Flight 5055, and the second-deadliest on Russian soil, after Aeroflot Flight 3352.
While landing in poor weather at 05:41 (local time) on 11 October 1984, the pilots saw something vague-shaped on the runway but were told by the air traffic controller that the runway was clear. Just after touchdown the pilots saw three maintenance vehicles on the runway that they were unable to avoid. Visibility was 3000 m, with rain, and haze.